Notes From the Log of a LEED Navigator: Pt.
2
By Gary Goodson, Deputy Director, Green Building
Alliance, Pittsburgh
March 1,
2004
Departments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer
The pursuit of a gold or platinum LEED-certified building often requires the
implementation of cutting-edge systems. This certainly was the case
with Pittsburgh's David L. Lawrence Convention Center. Again, in our
role as the project's LEED navigator—the agent on a LEED project responsible
for continually protecting green elements in the midst of budget
shortfalls, value engineering and construction uncertainties—the
Green Building Alliance (GBA), in the earliest stages of the
project, proposed a number of innovative features, one of which was
a green roof on the third-floor deck. We also had a solar energy
consultant investigate the possibility of placing
building-integrated photovoltaics into the flat portion of the roof
structure. Alas, not everything is possible. The green roof was not
approved, due to tight timelines, its initial expense and
maintenance concerns. When it came to the PV system, analysis
revealed that there was too much shading from adjacent buildings to
make the technology practical on a large scale.
On the other hand, many "green" technologies were successfully
implemented, notably the building's on-site water reclamation
system. This idea was proposed by Burt Hill Kosar Rittelmann Assocs.
(BHKR), the project's M/E/P engineer, during the design competition.
But it was later at risk due to its cost and the team's
unfamiliarity with the technology. Still, the commitment to LEED had a significant
impact on the final decision. As the navigator, we informed the team that
without the system, four to five LEED credits would be lost, along with the
opportunity to earn gold certification.
Trail markers:
- Fully investigate any proposed technology and talk to building
owners who can attest to its performance. Ideally, such project
examples can be found in your region.
- Take responsibility for checking references on at least three
existing installations of the proposed system.
- Carefully evaluate the strength of the business behind the
technology, including its capitalization, sales volume and level
of professionalism.
- Find out if the company selling the system has strong
representation in your area.
- Use bundled services provided by the same company whenever
possible.
- Ensure that warranty services on the system cover elements to
which it's affixed, such as the roof membrane in the case of a
green roof installation.
Hire computer modelers
Hand in glove with the use of sustainable technologies came the
need to employ computer modeling. For instance, accurate modeling of
unique building types, such as the dramatically curved roof designed
by Rafael Viñoly, requires strong skills and experience in the field
of building simulation that the majority of design firms do not
possess in-house. On this project, BHKR first used a heating and
cooling load-calculation program that was developed by an HVAC
equipment manufacturer. While this software would be appropriate for
the majority of load calculation applications, in this case there
were too many energy efficiency features for it to work efficiently.
Furthermore, many traditional load-calculation programs do not
account for daylighting controls very well. Additional computer
modeling, for which GBA wrote a grant proposal, and to which the
U.S. Dept. of Energy gave support, was used to estimate the
building's energy use and amount and quality of daylight. Bill
Browning, principal and founder of Green Development Services at the
Rocky Mountain Institute, assisted with this proposal, and DOE lent
one of its top energy-modeling experts: Vladimir Bazjanac from
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. CTG Energetics was later
hired by GBA to continue energy modeling work, while the design team
hired Cambridge, Mass.-based Lam Partners to complete the
daylighting study.
Although the building's large, curved roof presented challenges,
the combination of the DOE-2 software, Bazjanac and CTG proved more
than proficient in modeling the roof with even greater accuracy. To
assist with this challenge, CTG opted to use a newer version of
DOE-2 that had stronger capabilities for modeling unusual shapes.
When the complete analysis was finished, it indicated a peak-cooling
load of just 2,700 tons—46% less than BHKR's 5,000-ton estimate. The
difference in professional analyses, which roughly equated to
$1,000/ton or $2.3 million, led to a spirited debate. In the end,
6,000 tons of cooling capacity was specified to provide chilled
water for the convention center and an adjacent hotel. If the hotel
had been designed at the same time as the convention center,
optimizing the system's size would have been far easier. It is GBA's
hope that if additional chilled water capacity is available later
that it can be used for other developments adjacent to the
convention center, such as a nearby intermodal transportation
center. Over time, the actual cooling load requirements for the
convention center and hotel will become known and this critical
feedback will enable building owners and developers to provide
comfortable building environments in the future without super-sizing
HVAC systems.
Trail markers:
- Properly utilize building simulation software programs, such
as DOE-2, that are capable of modeling advanced energy-efficiency
measures, as this allows for more accurate cooling and heating
equipment sizing calculations.
- Right-size chillers, boilers, air handlers and pumps, as such
action can save on initial construction, as well as operation
costs.
Commissioning
Like some of the new technology installed within the building,
the value of building commissioning was hotly debated among members
of the design team and the building owner, the Pittsburgh Sports and
Exhibition Authority. While perhaps not new to consulting engineers,
this service is fairly new to many other people in the A/E/C
business. Not only does it require an increased budget, it presents
the challenge of an additional set of consultants to manage.
After much prodding, the owner agreed to move forward with
commissioning as long as GBA wrote the request for proposal,
selected candidates and raised necessary funding. CH2M Hill was
selected to work with BHKR at a total cost of $217,000. Of that
amount, SEA provided $50,000; the Dept. of Energy of Pennsylvania
contributed $100,000; and a local foundation, Citizen Power, donated
$25,000.
This undertaking, however, has already proven its worth. For
example, a 33% failure rate was found in the variable-air-volume fan
boxes. Many of these fans' motors were incorrectly wired at the
factory and the resulting natural resonance caused so much vibration
that some of fan blades actually fell off.
Trail markers:
- Start early to educate building owners about the value of
commissioning.
- Fully specify commissioning so that all subcontractors can
anticipate their responsibilities.
- Use commissioning agents with LEED-certified projects in their
portfolio.
- LEED Energy
& Atmosphere Credit 3 (additional commissioning) is frequently
audited by USGBC. Therefore, it is important that in the selecting
a commissioning agent, the agent be experienced in responding to
requests for additional information.
The job site
One of the final, but major, components of a successful LEED project is waste
management. On-site quality assurance is a fairly simple matter when
the green agent is from a construction company; it is another matter
entirely when that person is a third-party consultant.
Trail markers:
- Make necessary arrangements with a construction manager to
walk the job site, using OSHA-approved equipment, of course.
- Since unauthorized substitution of green materials, especially
adhesives and paints, is prevalent, constant vigilance by the
green agent is critical.
- Most installers welcome the use of green materials.
- Implement a demolition and construction waste management
program. This component is key and warrants further description in
and of itself.
What's
next?
Now that LEED
certification has grown in market value and building professionals
desire to have LEED
projects in their portfolios, the motivation is quite high to
overcome the challenges described here. Throughout the project,
green agents frequently and stridently assured other project team
members, "This may be your first LEED project, but it is not your last."
Even the skeptics among the team members now agree.
©
2005, Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.
All Rights Reserved.